National Security Secret
#249. Identifying a conflict of interest is relatively easy.Let's review using 2 or 3 examples:
- Individual 1: Works with or "oversees" Entity A, Entity B, or Entity C.
- No "favors" can be "owed" by Individual 1 to any Entity.
- No "favors" can be "owed" by any Entity to Individual 1.
- A conflict of interest exists if any "favors" are "owed" in either direction.
- Individual 2: Works with or "oversees" Entity A, Entity B, but not Entity C.
- No "favors" can be "owed" by Individual 2 to any Entity A or B.
- No "favors" can be "owed" by any Entity A or B to Individual 2.
- A conflict of interest exists if any "favors" are "owed" in either direction.
- Individual 3: Does not work with or "oversee" Entity A, Entity B, or Entity C.
- A single "favor" can be "owed" by Individual 3 to any Entity.
- It's unwise to "owe" more than a single "favor" to any individual or entity at any given point in time.
- A single "favor" can be "owed" by any Entity to Individual 3.
- It's unwise to "allow" more than a single "favor" to be "owed" to you by any individual or entity at any given point in time.
- Should an individual care about being free to make the right decisions from the best choices... they will never "accept" or "allow" a favor from any individual or entity... period.
The format we selected to "illustrate" this secret is or isn't unusual.
It's not technically "mathematical" nor a "commandment" in its application.
More information will be provided.
Originally posted on 05-08-2023 @ 12:35 PM
Updated on 05-08-2023 @ 12:45 PM
Comments
Post a Comment