#107. Michael Jackson's ear for music was so finely tuned he could detect reverse side tampering done to a song.

on

  National Security Secrets  

CONTENT UPDATED on 09-02-2023 @ 12:31 PM 
#107. Michael Jackson's ear for music was so finely tuned he could detect reverse side tampering done to a song.

"Interpolation" or "noise" didn't often escape his awareness or focus.

There's always some background noise present when music or vocals are performed or recorded.  It's a minor problem or none at all.

When a "clip" or "message" or "announcement" finds it's way into a recording's backward or reverse side... it should always be scrutinized.  If 2 or 3 of the following criteria are met, it didn't happen by accident:

  • Phrasing or wording which are forward, backward, or "backward backward" using sets of 2 or 3 choices or options.
  • "Hidden" or "masked" within changing or fluctuating frequencies or decibles.
    • This may take the form of an "interpolated" or "virtual" pan between channels or ranges of audio or noise.
  • Content which has no excuse or valid reason to be present under any reasonable circumstance.

First, some common knowledge from 1985.

  • There was significant recognition or regard for individuals of the Jackson family (musicians).
  • Many admirers or fans considered themselves "friends" of the family without ever meeting them.
  • It was mentionable or noteworthy or "worth sharing" each time an individual spoke to or saw a member of the Jackson family in public.

Those "impressions" may or may not have anything to do with the transcription obtained.  It was heard or perceived after using an analog technique to extract audio from a "noisy" recording.  It's a relatively quick method but produces subjective results. A source recording from YouTube of "Rhythm of the Night" was used.  The content may or may not be related to unexplained "rumors" involving El Debarge or Janet Jackson circa the early 1980s.

  • "...was or not wasn't [divorced or married] to [Michael or Janet] [Jackson or Shamone]..."
  • "...was or not wasn't a [brief or pretend] [marriage or arrangement]..."
  • "...[when or while] [we or they] were or not weren't [children or kids] [in or out] [school or kindergarten]..."
That was followed or preceded by:
  • "...[got or gave] [you or them] [bad or good] [Debarge or Michael or whoever you are  or whatever you call yourself]..."
  • "...now [you or they] have to [change or disguise] [your or their] [name or identity]..."
  • "...[disappear or vanish]..."
The clip provided does NOT contain those details or they're buried too deep to easily perceive.  It's lacking in detail but only took a few minutes to produce.


More information will be provided.



Originally posted on 02-23-2023 @ 11:27 PM
Updated on 09-02-2023 @ 10:31 AM
Updated on 09-02-2023 @ 11:31 AM
Updated on 09-02-2023 @ 12:31 PM

Comments

Post a Comment